Author Topic: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing  (Read 17317 times)

Offline emil@vems.se

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38
  • BHP: 14
Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« on: April 16, 2010, 11:27:29 pm »
http://vems.hu/download/v3gui/VemsTune-Install-2010-04-16-testing.exe
New thread for a new testing release
Main fixes:
MSQ export should work with MS log viewer (If this now works to everyones liking, re-import of VE table might be started next week)
Statistics should not crash like it did before
Added outlier removal to statistics, multiplier is in standard deviations(?), 2 recommended for short logs, 1 for long logs
Multigraph (log viewer) should not crash the whole program
small menu changes (cosmetics mostly)
round gauge emergency revival even more improved (used when firmware upgrade gone bad!)
changes to communications again that could improve stability
installer script update, more likely to support win7
« Last Edit: May 22, 2010, 10:25:10 am by mattias »

Offline BigD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • BHP: 6
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2010, 12:45:57 am »
I saw this in the last version too but if I forget to open a log file and hit Re-Evaluate in the stats, it brings my computer to its knees. If I can kill it in time, it only bloats to about 400 meg of ram. Minor bug but this probably shouldn't be available with no stats open.

Offline multiplex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • BHP: 6
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2010, 12:53:34 am »
pretty sure you still have to select the 'input source' as logs. It will automatically open up a window to select the log.  you can then run the stats, and apply.

then i guess you save the config and upload it once you are connected to the car again?

MSQ exports, and opens in MLV. However when i try to run the analysis nothing happens.  I'm trying to see what needs to be tweaked to make it happen. MLV is converted the lambda table into AFR, so that seems good but i'm wondering if the table size difference is an issue at all for MLV

I'll post back if i figure anything out

Offline emil@vems.se

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38
  • BHP: 14
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2010, 01:35:34 am »
pretty sure you still have to select the 'input source' as logs. It will automatically open up a window to select the log.  you can then run the stats, and apply.
You can choose either that button, or just open log in the file menu.

Quote
then i guess you save the config and upload it once you are connected to the car again?
Yes, this is one of the largest problem around now, some automatic detection of getting back online is needed, and a question if you want to upload changes or loose it.

Quote
MSQ exports, and opens in MLV. However when i try to run the analysis nothing happens.  I'm trying to see what needs to be tweaked to make it happen. MLV is converted the lambda table into AFR, so that seems good but i'm wondering if the table size difference is an issue at all for MLV

I'll post back if i figure anything out

So halfway done then ;)
I hope you can find the reason, so we can go on to the next stage to re-upload the analyzed table.

Offline GintsK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
  • BHP: 50
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2010, 01:46:52 am »
Table size difference? You mean 16x14 VE and smaller Lambda table? No it is not MLV issue.

For me this new version hangs at first step I want perform - firmware upgrade.

I make little error at beginning: choose firmware (1.1.71 - non-PS) and hit upload, but at same time noticed my board was unpowered. In a second I switch it on and update process seems going as normal. After few seconds - blue screen! Didn't seen it for months! Then three times retried (after forced PC restart every time). Same happens.

System event viewer stores error ID:7023 related to Service Control Manager.
In blue screen ser2pl.sys is mentioned.

Downgrade to 2010.04.13 VT - works ok...

Gints

« Last Edit: April 17, 2010, 01:49:20 am by GintsK »

Offline multiplex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • BHP: 6
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2010, 02:07:34 am »
Ok here is a MSQ i hacked together and cleaned out, from my previous trials.  It runs well in MLV, even with the different table sizes

I haven't had time to compare it to what is now coming out of VT.  I'll try to work on that

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<msq xmlns="http://www.msefi.com/:msq">
   <bibliography author="MegaTune 2.25" writeDate="2008-03-11T06:39:45+00:00"/>
   <versionInfo fileFormat="4.0" nPages="7" signature="VEMS v1.1 16x14 kpa=2,2"/>
   <page number="1" size="254">
      <constant name="mapBins" rows="14" units="kPa">
         20
         38
         54
         72
         88
         104
         118
         142
         166
         192
         216
         242
         266
         290
      </constant>
      <constant name="rpmBins" rows="16" units="RPM">
         900
         1300
         1800
         2200
         2700
         3100
         3500
         4000
         4400
         4900
         5300
         5700
         6200
         6600
         7100
         7500
      </constant>
      <constant cols="16" name="veTable" rows="14" units="%">
         11.0 12.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 16.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 21.0 35.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
         11.0 19.0 22.0 17.0 17.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 16.0 19.0 33.0 35.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
         15.0 30.0 32.0 26.0 27.0 25.0 26.0 28.0 25.0 25.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0
         25.0 41.0 43.0 41.0 44.0 41.0 41.0 44.0 36.0 39.0 49.0 48.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
         26.0 59.0 71.0 53.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 58.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0
         29.0 53.0 70.0 67.0 71.0 70.0 70.0 71.0 65.0 67.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0
         29.0 58.0 61.0 74.0 82.0 82.0 84.0 89.0 86.0 90.0 94.0 89.0 94.0 91.0 90.0 90.0
         34.0 59.0 59.0 61.0 103.0 97.0 104.0 104.0 98.0 102.0 120.0 129.0 131.0 125.0 124.0 124.0
         35.0 59.0 59.0 56.0 114.0 126.0 122.0 124.0 123.0 130.0 164.0 164.0 175.0 170.0 160.0 160.0
         35.0 54.0 59.0 60.0 105.0 153.0 145.0 145.0 150.0 165.0 208.0 217.0 224.0 209.0 210.0 210.0
         36.0 54.0 59.0 64.0 98.0 174.0 173.0 174.0 177.0 183.0 195.0 220.0 223.0 218.0 215.0 215.0
         36.0 54.0 59.0 71.0 101.0 144.0 199.0 193.0 208.0 214.0 218.0 230.0 231.0 230.0 230.0 230.0
         36.0 54.0 59.0 71.0 101.0 144.0 201.0 204.0 233.0 232.0 230.0 230.0 231.0 230.0 230.0 230.0
         36.0 54.0 59.0 71.0 101.0 144.0 201.0 204.0 233.0 232.0 230.0 230.0 231.0 230.0 230.0 255.0
      </constant>
   </page>
   <page number="2" size="254">
      <constant cols="8" name="afrBins1" rows="8" units="Lambda">
    0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
       0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
       0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
       0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
       0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81
       0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
       0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
       0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

      </constant>
      <constant name="mapBinsA" rows="8" units="kPa">
         20
         38
         72
         104
         166
         192
         242
         290
      </constant>
      <constant name="rpmBinsA" rows="8" units="RPM">
         900
         1300
         2200
         2700
         4000
         5300
         6200
         7500
      </constant>
   </page>
</msq>
« Last Edit: April 17, 2010, 02:20:41 am by multiplex »

Offline emil@vems.se

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38
  • BHP: 14
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2010, 02:51:34 am »
Table size difference? You mean 16x14 VE and smaller Lambda table? No it is not MLV issue.

For me this new version hangs at first step I want perform - firmware upgrade.

I make little error at beginning: choose firmware (1.1.71 - non-PS) and hit upload, but at same time noticed my board was unpowered. In a second I switch it on and update process seems going as normal. After few seconds - blue screen! Didn't seen it for months! Then three times retried (after forced PC restart every time). Same happens.

System event viewer stores error ID:7023 related to Service Control Manager.
In blue screen ser2pl.sys is mentioned.

Downgrade to 2010.04.13 VT - works ok...

Gints


What windows version and hardware?
I just heard that "Run as administrator" might be needed for vista and win7

Offline GintsK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
  • BHP: 50
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2010, 03:09:02 am »
Sorry! Plain XP SP2 PentiumM 1.6ghz 1.25GB ram T40p Thinkpad.

Offline multiplex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • BHP: 6
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2010, 02:41:41 am »
cracked the issue with running VE tune in MLV with the exported MSQ

the resolution of the MAP & BIN tables is too large.. Drop the ".00" and it works

i replaced all of the ".00" with a space, and everything works as is.

 ;D

Offline lost

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
  • BHP: 2
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2010, 05:58:53 am »
It would be nice to have 1024x600.support. Some windows are too big :)

Offline emil@vems.se

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38
  • BHP: 14
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2010, 04:32:03 pm »
cracked the issue with running VE tune in MLV with the exported MSQ

the resolution of the MAP & BIN tables is too large.. Drop the ".00" and it works

i replaced all of the ".00" with a space, and everything works as is.

 ;D
I will try to fix this today, Will it do with no decimals for one dimensional arrays?

Quote
It would be nice to have 1024x600.support. Some windows are too big
An additional screen resolution will be added for the netbooks, so actually already planned.
thanks for pointing it out.

Offline emil@vems.se

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38
  • BHP: 14
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2010, 04:48:51 pm »
Sorry for the big post, but this is the output of msq export with my last change, just taken straight from my vemstune generated file and pasted here

Code: [Select]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<msq xmlns="http://www.msefi.com/:msq">
  <page number="1"/>
  <page number="2">
    <constant name="veTable" rows="14" cols="16" units="%" offset="0">
       50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 38.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 44.0 28.0 28.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
       0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
     </constant>
    <constant name="rpmBinsVE" rows="16" units="RPM" offset="224">
       500
     800
     1000
     1300
     1700
     2000
     2400
     2700
     3000
     3500
     4000
     4500
     5000
     5500
     6000
     6700
     </constant>
    <constant name="mapBinsVE" rows="14" units="kPa" offset="240">
       40
     60
     70
     80
     90
     100
     110
     120
     130
     140
     160
     180
     200
     220
     </constant>
  </page>
  <page number="3">
    <constant name="lambdaTable" rows="8" cols="8" units="Lambda" offset="0">
       1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
       1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
       0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.99
       0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97
       0.86 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92
       0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90
       0.82 0.82 0.81 0.79 0.83 0.85 0.83 0.83
       0.81 0.81 0.81 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.76
     </constant>
    <constant name="rpmBinsLambda" rows="8" units="RPM" offset="64">
       700
     1000
     2000
     2600
     4100
     4900
     6100
     6700
     </constant>
    <constant name="mapBinsLambda" rows="8" units="kPa" offset="72">
       20
     30
     70
     80
     102
     116
     200
     320
     </constant>
  </page>
  <page number="4">
    <constant name="sparkTable" rows="12" cols="12" units="Deg" offset="0">
       17 19 25 40 42 43 43 43 43 43 43 42
       16 19 22 38 39 40 41 41 41 41 41 41
       15 19 22 37 38 39 40 40 40 40 40 40
       14 18 21 31 36 37 38 39 40 40 40 40
       14 18 21 27 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 34
       13 17 20 24 30 31 32 33 34 34 34 34
       12 17 20 23 29 30 31 33 34 34 34 34
       12 14 15 16 23 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
       11 13 14 16 23 23 25 25 25 25 25 25
       11 13 14 16 19 22 22 24 25 25 26 27
       9 10 12 14 19 22 22 24 24 24 24 24
       9 9 10 12 17 18 21 22 24 26 27 27
     </constant>
    <constant name="rpmBinsSpark" rows="12" units="RPM" offset="144">
       700
     1000
     1400
     2000
     2600
     3400
     4100
     4900
     5500
     6100
     6700
     8800
     </constant>
    <constant name="mapBinsSpark" rows="12" units="kPa" offset="156">
       20
     30
     50
     70
     80
     86
     102
     116
     140
     200
     320
     420
     </constant>
  </page>
  <page number="5"/>
  <page number="6"/>
  <page number="7"/>
  <page number="8"/>
  <page number="9"/>
  <page number="10"/>
  <page number="11"/>
  <page number="15"/>
</msq>
« Last Edit: April 19, 2010, 04:56:42 pm by emil@vems.se »

Offline multiplex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • BHP: 6
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2010, 06:50:10 pm »
works great!  ;D

Offline krzycho-g

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • BHP: 0
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2010, 02:39:49 pm »
as I wrote in another topic, i use noniverted drivers and inverted value in h[0]. In an earlier version was seen marked value, and not new.
Might like the option of Ignition settings -> Inverted drivers could make such an option in Settings Injection ECU or Settings?
In any version you can not select the same box for different outputs

Offline badjuju

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
  • BHP: 1
Re: Vemstune 2010-04-16 testing
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2010, 09:22:51 pm »
Double posting this at the direction of Rob:

When I'm in my car, my laptop doesn't have internet access to download the new firmware via the webtool.

So, I hooked it all up, got it to recognize VEMS was there, walked into my house, got the wireless up and running, opened the firmware web tool, downloaded 1.1.70, then went out into the garage, hooked into vems, and clicked install.

It didn't give me any sort of confirmation that the firmware had been flashed, except that next to 1.1.70, in the "local" box on the right, it said "installed" next to 1.1.70.

The bottom of VT, next to the status, says I'm running 1.0.73 still.  IniFile is still 1.0.73.

I Thought this was weird, oh well.  I Clicked and dragged M's config file over, told it to upload, and it did, hooray, except it gave me a bunch of scalar errors and warnings and whatnot.  I ran the sanity check again, and it came up fine.

I checked the wideband settings portion, and I still have my original message under "retry after".

What am I doing wrong?

I can't just upload via the "upload firmware....bat" method, because it isn't in either of the downloads I've been able to find.

Entire previous thread here:
http://195.159.109.134/vemsuk/forum/index.php/topic,1209.0.html