News:

New Users: Send [email protected] an email with your account name. I've turned off auto-approve to reduce the 100 new spam accounts a day. Thanks, -Jason

Main Menu

Launch control with potentiometer

Started by Sam8888, March 16, 2016, 05:01:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sam8888

Hi everyone!

I'm planning to control the launch control RPM with a pontentiometer to anytrim input. I wonder what's better for the job:

This is with a simple 10K linear potentiometer:



Or with a voltage divider, wich looks like this:



How you guys used to do that?

Sam8888

Anybody? Nobody did the adjustable launch control?  ???

Kamuto

that's not the way you do it :)
I mean, why there is a pushbutton?
Vems installer in Lithuania
[email protected]

Sam8888

#3
Quote from: Kamuto on March 21, 2016, 08:10:56 AM
that's not the way you do it :)
I mean, why there is a pushbutton?

Because i want to activate it on the same circuit. In this way it's only need 1 analog input. When i wire the button to another input, then the launch control will be using 2.

So if i push the button -> launch control activated to the adjusted RPM (which i  can adjust with the potentiometer).
If i release the button -> launch control deactivated.

Sam8888


jrussell

I'm not so sure that both of these functions can use the same input. Enable and adjust at the same time. Maybe it will work?

Personally, I'd try it with the first diagram, as the voltage divider will just make the control less granular. That may be an advantage at the end, but try without the voltage divider first.
VEMS USA - Located in beautiful Burlington, Vermont
1988 RX7 Turbo

fphil

I see the 2 diagrams as voltage dividers with about the same scale(0-5V or 0-4.9V) but I may have missed something.

Sam8888

Quote from: jrussell on March 24, 2016, 02:25:03 PM
I'm not so sure that both of these functions can use the same input. Enable and adjust at the same time. Maybe it will work?

Personally, I'd try it with the first diagram, as the voltage divider will just make the control less granular. That may be an advantage at the end, but try without the voltage divider first.

Thanks for the reply! I guess i will do it on the separate way then. I thought it will work on one input that way, don't wanna experiment with.