++++++++
I read the post "WideBand problem" from DevInAz after writing these comments
.
"I had a similar problem, but since i had been seriously messing around with it, I ended up replacing the board too"
My Vems is also a brand new one. Does someone know the technical matter with the Vems board which makes them replacing each time the calibration function does not work?
+++++++++
I finally bought a "Round WB02". This way my double WB02 need will be solved.
I was puzzled for a while when I see no way to calibrate the controller / the sensor as the calibration options of the tool menu of VT are disabled.
Anyway when plugged, it seems to work.
After while (sorry I do not have ethernet connection on the spot where the car is parked) I read at wiki page AfreshTiny/FirmwareUpgrade that "Round WBO2" is self-calibrating. Nothing was said in the Round box apart the set point of the Heater controller and of the Nersnt controller, which is at this point useless. (A short notice could save 1 hour from the customer time)
Then I turned back to the WB02 controller of the Vems 3.6 using 1.1.98 firmware. I launched the auto calibration of the tools menu, keeping the sensor in free air, still heating for minutes .... no more. I also tried the terminal mode (the 02 value is given page mlp07 now on), started the debug mode, the sensor went heating … then …no outcome.
Finally I got the car running, on dual WB02. At idle, on left bank Round shows 0.90, on right bank Vems shows 0.88. Swapping Round and Vems gives same bank result. Hurrah !!
- My temporary conclusion: Vems firmware 1.1.98 has got a WB02 self-calibration function as well.
Could you confirm this point ?. I am not sure of that since the line for the calibration resistance of the sensor is not wired on Vems -as it is on Round)
Of course if it is not, how one makes the VT/tools/calibration to work?
I any case it could be fair to check from time o time that Round or Vems WB02 is given 20.9 in open air … How to do that?
Then I the played a little with the Nernst PID parameters about the actual factory set up (on my own risk because I have been with such things for some tenth of years). The only behaviour which can be readily observed is the lambda response curve to a throttle step. I noticed a large overshoot, lambda reaching the end of scale of 1.8. I see no good reason for that
Thank you for your comments.
Philippe