Has anyone used alphaN blending? Is it worth the effort of making the hybrid tables?
I am suspicious of using alphaN for the whole of my map. I don't know why, but it just doesn't feel "right".
But there is so little resolution at low RPM/low load that pressure based tables don't really work.
(MAP at idle is 60 to 65 kPa) When the engine is loaded, the MAP works nicely as you'd expect.
I'm a bit worried that with the blended tables I could run off the top edge of the map - 104kPa is equivilent 40% TPS, isn't it? - so should I compromise the resolution at high RPM (in the SD region) to get some more range in the low RPM (AlphaN region)? Or is it a case of 40% throttle will raise the revs so fast that it'll be speed density no matter what? (I suspect this isn't the case for a large capacity v8 with enormous amounts of torque from idle, provided I'm engaged in the activity of moving imovable objects from rest
)
Also, how do things like pressure based fuel cuts work with alphaN? If I wanted to cut fuel at less than 20kPa, would that mean I cut fuel at 0% TPS, such that idle becomes rather troublesome?